Caspian Navigation

Food, Beverage & Agriculture

Three regulatory agencies. One border crossing. More duty recovery opportunity.

Food processors, beverage companies, and agricultural exporters operate at the intersection of CBP, FDA, and USDA; three agencies with overlapping jurisdiction and independent enforcement authority. That complexity discourages most companies from looking closely at what they've paid. It shouldn't.

Are you overpaying?

The Tariff Landscape for Food, Beverage & Agriculture

Agricultural trade policy is among the most politically volatile in the US — and the most susceptible to sudden rate changes. Section 301 retaliatory tariffs on Chinese-origin food products and agricultural inputs arrived in 2018 and have been modified repeatedly since. IEEPA actions have added new duty exposure on products ranging from imported ingredients to packaging materials. Meanwhile, foreign retaliatory tariffs on US agricultural exports have compressed margins on the export side while duties on imported inputs compound costs on the production side.

The companies navigating this best aren't the ones with the most insulated supply chains. They're the ones who audit both directions: identifying what they overpaid coming in and recovering duties on everything that went back out. American agricultural exporters are among the most naturally drawback-eligible businesses in the country. Grain processors, distillers, meat packers, and food manufacturers import inputs and export finished products continuously. The refund mechanism was written with exactly this trade pattern in mind.

Recovery Opportunities

Rejected Merchandise Drawback on Failed Shipments

Food and agricultural products are subject to FDA and USDA inspection at the border. As a result, a meaningful volume of shipments are rejected, returned, or destroyed every year due to inspection failures, labeling violations, or specification mismatches. Goods that are exported or destroyed after CBP entry under federal supervision qualify for rejected merchandise drawback. These claims are time-sensitive and systematically unfiled across the industry.

Section 301 Overpayments on Imported Ingredients

Food manufacturers sourcing ingredients, additives, or processing inputs from China have significant Section 301 exposure. Misclassification of specialty ingredients, agricultural chemicals, and food-grade industrial inputs into higher-rate HTS codes is common across high-SKU-count food production operations. Caspian audits every entry against the current tariff schedule and recovers overpayments through post-summary corrections within the liquidation window.

Agricultural Export Drawback Under FTA Provisions

US companies exporting to FTA partner countries, including those under USMCA, KORUS, and CAFTA-DR, may qualify for reduced-rate or duty-free treatment on exported agricultural products while still recovering duties paid on imported inputs used in production. First-sale valuation opportunities on multi-tier agricultural supply chains can also meaningfully reduce the dutiable value on future entries.

Don't Get Caught Off Guard

Food, Beverage & Agriculture Compliance Risks

The food and beverage sector operates under a compliance framework that most importers didn't sign up for. CBP handles the duty side. FDA handles food safety and labeling. USDA handles agricultural products and plant/animal health. All three can hold a shipment, assess penalties, or initiate enforcement, often independently. Companies that haven't mapped their regulatory exposure across all three agencies are managing risk they can't see.

Country of Origin Requirements Under COOL

Country of Origin Labeling requirements for beef, pork, fish, fresh produce, and other covered commodities are enforced at retail but trace directly back to the import entry. CBP and USDA coordinate enforcement of COOL discrepancies, and the penalty exposure extends well beyond the duty impact. Multi-country sourcing requires COO documentation that holds up under both agencies simultaneously.

FDA Prior Notice and Admissibility Compliance

Every food shipment entering the US requires FDA Prior Notice filing before arrival. Errors and late submissions trigger holds, refusals, and automatic detention of future shipments from the same facility. Prior Notice compliance runs on the same entry data that drives drawback eligibility — getting either wrong creates problems on both sides.

USDA Phytosanitary and Veterinary Compliance

Plant materials, meat, poultry, and dairy face USDA APHIS and FSIS oversight parallel to CBP requirements. A shipment that clears customs can still be held, destroyed, or re-exported based on USDA findings, generating compliance costs and drawback eligibility that most importers never act on.

No Surprises

Transparent Pricing

We offer clear, project-based pricing for all audit and compliance services. Get a fixed quote upfront, with no surprises.

start trade audit

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is food, beverage, and agriculture a growing drawback sector?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

Three converging factors drive the opportunity: commodity price volatility that has expanded duty exposure on imported inputs, country-of-origin tariff shifts that change which imports are duty-burdened from year to year, and increased agricultural and packaged food exports as U.S. brands expand internationally. Together, these create a recovery opportunity that's growing rather than static.

What kinds of food and beverage imports qualify for drawback?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

Imported ingredients, packaging materials, processing inputs, and finished products that are subsequently exported, or used in exported finished goods, qualify under the relevant drawback programs. For food processors, beverage companies, and agricultural exporters, this typically means imported commodity inputs (sugar, cocoa, coffee, specialty ingredients) and packaging components that flow into exported products.

How do USDA, FDA, and CBP regulations interact?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

Food and beverage imports are subject to multiple regulatory regimes: CBP collects duties, FDA regulates safety and labeling, USDA regulates agricultural products, and APHIS regulates animal and plant products. Drawback is a CBP function and doesn't require FDA or USDA involvement, but the underlying import documentation may need to satisfy all relevant agencies. Caspian's Trade Audit operates on the customs side. FDA and USDA compliance is handled separately.

Are excise taxes on alcohol and tobacco recoverable?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

In some cases, yes. Federal excise taxes paid on imported alcohol used in industrial applications or exported, and on certain tobacco products, may be recoverable through drawback when the goods are subsequently exported or used in exported products. The eligibility rules are specific. Caspian's Trade Audit identifies which entries qualify.

What about agricultural commodity imports under tariff-rate quotas?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

Tariff-rate quotas (TRQs) apply to many agricultural commodities, including sugar, dairy, beef, and certain produce, with lower in-quota rates and higher above-quota rates. Duty paid at above-quota rates is generally recoverable under drawback when the goods are exported. For commodity importers operating near TRQ thresholds, the recovery opportunity is significant when the higher rate applies.

How does Caspian handle the seasonality of food and agriculture imports?
Expandable icon for frequently asked question section

Seasonality affects duty exposure but not drawback eligibility. Claims can be filed against entries from any point in the five-year window. Caspian's Trade Audit scans the full eligible window regardless of when imports occurred, which matters for sectors with concentrated seasonal import patterns followed by year-round exports.